What has legal ramification, eligibility to, and conciliatory possibility?  The asterisk:  it's the conundrum of the journalists' toolbox.  We "decry" valuable service, through implied, if not applied, worthlessness.

Here, we'll review case in point, and the implications of usage of the asterisk, according to legal prescription, leading to usage across all technical and analytical writings.  The following definition of terms, according to letter formula, is a very rudimentary delivery… but, an exact formula for usage, nonetheless.

Asterisk:  A very defined presumption of possibility, according to guilt “the risk, as implied, or applied, according to disinterest."

An asterisk, appears as a whisper, and is used as the silent or unspoken warning to the reader, in any work in which it appears; it is visual permanence, by value and by time, and decides a corresponding value according to defiance.  One may or may not defy relevance; however, an asterisk's value is realized upon adherence to the document upon, or writing in which, it appears, regardless of relevance, and regardless of behavior of legal relevance, or simply through definition of the terms of such asterisk… so, this is the foundation of all legal presumption, the asterisk-implied, if not applied, is sought as all legal remedy.

It is my assertion, that an asterisk, is legal impudence.  All legal recourse presumes the adherence of the asterisk, whether it exists on paper, or in reality, or whether it is, in fact, realized through some legal awareness, by the civilian, or legally illiterate citizen, or not.  

It is also my assertion, that, now, since the asterisk is in common usage, and since all possibility for deviance of contract or eligibility quality, cannot be ascertained and belied, such asterisk, any asterisk, implied or applied, is void.  (This being qualified and defined here, since all legal proceedings, are registered and brought to jurisdiction, according to case study, applied, and all case study may be reviewed according to all relevance… so, any loophole is easily surrendered, or won, through a basic understanding of relevance.)  Also, the asterisk, according to consumerism, is negate, since “caveat emptor” is discord; it cannot be applied, according to our judicial system, technically, and is easily manipulated through a basic understanding of American History, and legal case study. 

Star Qualities, reduced to succession (***) … these may be distinguished, as by quote, or by recitation of authority.  This being the asterisk, in use as ‘cite'.

Caveat Emptor:  This, is the asterisk used as qualification of a risk, or many instances of a dangerous presumption of  guilt (in multiplicitous usage).

"What happens if," in the response to ‘possibility of’: the asterisk in use as attent toward a notion (the Loyalty Asterisk™).

The Loyalty Asterisk™, in my opinion, should be presumed a lure, by default.  It assumes no risk, and provokes suspended interest… “we hope you’ll buy, we respect your guarded vigilance in defining the worth of this offer; however, we are not financially equipped to assume all risk” … with the prescribed over-use of the asterisk, implied, and applied, the Loyalty Asterisk™ is, defined herein, an expression of the philosophy of “buyer beware”… which doesn’t technically, exist, according to implied usage of the asterisk across the American Judicial System.  The good news here, is that a true marketer, toward a loyalty perspective, is at least providing a red flag of concern.

A flawless remedy retained through social responsibility and PR, according to the avoidance of all legal action, is in the prescribed diligence it takes to understand your business concern, to apply your marketing, ONLY, to your market, and to decide culpability, as a responsible behavior, when and where applicable, to resource.  We work and deal, only with those having equivalent moral and ethical value, disallowing for confusion, through legally bound contractual permanence.  All business matters, then, should be protected and assured gainful economic gratification, without the threat of concern, as can and should be delivered and legally adhered, through the customized prescription of bound contractual definition.  This, through the constant, and ironclad correctness of APPLIED star quality. 

An asterisk is implied behavior; so, if the risk is not applied... loyalty assumes no risk, and effort is value-decreed.

Conundrum to clarity, in one fell swoop.

Politics